This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The effect of early versus delayed surgical debridement on the outcome of open long bone fractures at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania
- Njee Nobert†1, 2,
- Nyambura Moremi†3,
- Jeremiah Seni†3Email author,
- Ramesh M. Dass1, 2,
- Isdori H. Ngayomela1, 2,
- Stephen E. Mshana3 and
- Japhet M. Gilyoma1, 2
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 6 September 2015
Accepted: 16 June 2016
Published: 4 July 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Howard Champion|
|7 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ines Correia-Sà|
|13 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ming- Terk Chiu|
|21 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Njee Nobert|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ming- Terk Chiu|
|3 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Howard Champion|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Jun 2016||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jul 2016||Article published||10.1186/s13032-016-0036-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.