Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A feasibility study of 60 consecutive patients operated for unstable thoracic cage

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jan 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Hans Granhed
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Mani
31 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Timothy Moore
13 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Hans Granhed
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Sep 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Mani
7 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Bemelman
17 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Hans Granhed
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 Nov 2014 Editorially accepted
30 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/s13032-014-0020-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement