This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A feasibility study of 60 consecutive patients operated for unstable thoracic cage
© Granhed and Pazooki; licensee BioMed Central. 2015
Received: 28 January 2014
Accepted: 21 November 2014
Published: 30 December 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Jan 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Hans Granhed|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kevin Mani|
|31 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timothy Moore|
|13 Aug 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Hans Granhed|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Aug 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Sep 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kevin Mani|
|7 Oct 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Bemelman|
|17 Nov 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Hans Granhed|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Nov 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Nov 2014||Editorially accepted|
|30 Dec 2014||Article published||10.1186/s13032-014-0020-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.