Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Distraction by a monotube fixator to achieve limb lengthening: predictive factors for tibia trauma

  • Olayinka O Adegbehingbe1Email author,
  • Owolabi D Ojo2,
  • Paul O Abiola2,
  • Abimbola L Ariyibi2,
  • Lawrence M Oginni1 and
  • John A Obateru2
Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes20137:3

Received: 3 November 2011

Accepted: 4 May 2013

Published: 14 May 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
3 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - olayinka oladiran Adegbehingbe
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olawumi Popoola
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
4 May 2013 Editorially accepted
14 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1752-2897-7-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Orthopedic Surgery & Traumatology, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Federal Medical Centres, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria