This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Distraction by a monotube fixator to achieve limb lengthening: predictive factors for tibia trauma
© Adegbehingbe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 3 November 2011
Accepted: 4 May 2013
Published: 14 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - olayinka oladiran Adegbehingbe|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|12 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olawumi Popoola|
|Resubmission - Version 8|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 8|
|4 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|14 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1752-2897-7-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.