Skip to main content


Open Peer Review Reports for: Distraction by a monotube fixator to achieve limb lengthening: predictive factors for tibia trauma

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
3 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - olayinka oladiran Adegbehingbe
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olawumi Popoola
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
4 May 2013 Editorially accepted
14 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1752-2897-7-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.