This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Implant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey
© Vos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 January 2012
Accepted: 23 July 2012
Published: 3 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dirk Stengel|
|7 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - nikolaus schwarz|
|11 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - rogier simmermacher|
|20 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Dagmar Vos|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|3 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1752-2897-6-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.