This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007
© Clancy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 4 June 2011
Accepted: 13 March 2012
Published: 13 March 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Jun 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julie Mayglothling|
|4 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neil Parry|
|26 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew W Kirkpatrick|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julie Mayglothling|
|8 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neil Parry|
|29 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Andrew W Kirkpatrick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|13 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1752-2897-6-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.