This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Clinical profiles and risk factors for outcomes in older patients with cervical and trochanteric hip fracture: similarities and differences
© Fisher et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 February 2011
Accepted: 15 February 2012
Published: 15 February 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Giusti|
|11 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Crilly|
|12 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Alexander Fisher|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Crilly|
|2 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Alexander Fisher|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Crilly|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Feb 2012||Editorially accepted|
|15 Feb 2012||Article published||10.1186/1752-2897-6-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.