Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinical profiles and risk factors for outcomes in older patients with cervical and trochanteric hip fracture: similarities and differences

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Feb 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Giusti
11 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Crilly
12 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Fisher
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Crilly
2 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Fisher
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Crilly
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
15 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1752-2897-6-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement