Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Protective and risk factors in amateur equestrians and description of injury patterns: A retrospective data analysis and a case - control survey

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helge Schoenfeld
13 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chad Ball
1 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Hessler
7 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Valerie Malka
7 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Mulloy
24 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beate Hanson
18 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Rebecca Hasler
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rebecca Hasler
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
4 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1752-2897-5-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement