Protective and risk factors in amateur equestrians and description of injury patterns: A retrospective data analysis and a case - control survey
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Jul 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helge Schoenfeld|
|13 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chad Ball|
|1 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Hessler|
|7 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Valerie Malka|
|7 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Mulloy|
|24 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Beate Hanson|
|18 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Rebecca Hasler|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Rebecca Hasler|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Jan 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Feb 2011||Editorially accepted|
|4 Feb 2011||Article published||10.1186/1752-2897-5-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.