Peer Review reports
From: Occult pneumothorax, revisited
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chad Ball |
31 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hesham Omar |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ahmed Fathy |
31 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hesham Omar |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hesham Omar |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chad Ball |
9 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hesham Omar |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
21 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hesham Omar |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
21 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
2 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Hesham Omar |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
2 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
29 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-2897-4-12 |
You can find further information about peer review here.