Research
Open Access
Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Outcome after severe head injury: focal surgical lesions do not imply a better Glasgow Outcome Score than diffuse injuries at 3 months
Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes20093:5
https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-3-5
© Leach et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 20 November 2008
Accepted: 03 April 2009
Published: 03 April 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amin Tabish |
| 28 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Omar Nathan Pathmanaban |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 28 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Apr 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Apr 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-2897-3-5 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Division of Neurosurgery, GMNC, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
(2)
Department of Neurointensive Care, GMNC, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
