Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Outcome after severe head injury: focal surgical lesions do not imply a better Glasgow Outcome Score than diffuse injuries at 3 months

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Journal of Trauma Management & Outcomes20093:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-3-5

Received: 20 November 2008

Accepted: 03 April 2009

Published: 03 April 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Nov 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amin Tabish
28 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Omar Nathan Pathmanaban
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
3 Apr 2009 Editorially accepted
3 Apr 2009 Article published 10.1186/1752-2897-3-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Neurosurgery, GMNC, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
(2)
Department of Neurointensive Care, GMNC, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Advertisement