Table 1 Summary of patient profiles, treatment methods & final outcomes
From: The floating knee: epidemiology, prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management
Patient No: | Age | Sex | Side | Type | Treatment | Complications | Final Outcome (Karlstrom criteria) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 40 | M | R | 2B | Other | None | Excellent |
2 | 19 | M | L | 2B | Other | Infection | Poor |
3 | 56 | M | R | 2B | Other | None | Excellent |
4 | 27 | M | R | 2A | Other | Delayed union | Poor |
5 | 24 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
6 | 42 | M | L | 2A | Other | None | Good |
7 | 27 | M | L | 1 | Both IM nail | Foot drop | Acceptable |
8 | 24 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
9 | 21 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
10 | 32 | F | L | 2B | Other | Knee stiff | Good |
11 | 30 | M | R | 2B | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
12 | 21 | M | L | 1 | Other | Knee stiff | Good |
13 | 35 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
14 | 22 | F | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Good |
15 | 20 | M | L | 1 | Both IM nail | Delayed union | Poor |
16 | 22 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | Infection | Good |
17 | 35 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
18 | 19 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
19 | 22 | M | R | 0 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
20 | 40 | M | L | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Good |
21 | 22 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
22 | 35 | M | L | 2A | Other | Knee stiff | Acceptable |
23 | 24 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Good |
24 | 25 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
25 | 18 | M | R | 2B | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
26 | 28 | M | L | 1 | Other | Knee stiff | Good |
27 | 22 | M | L | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
28 | 31 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Excellent |
29 | 26 | M | R | 1 | Both IM nail | None | Good |