Study | Filter Type | No. Patients | Insertion Complications* | Filter Migration | Caval Occlusion | IVC Penetration |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greenfield et al. 2000[59] | 53% - Titanium GF | 385 - Initial | 24/385 (6%) | 6/293 (2%) | 7/293 (2.4%) | 2/293 (0.6%) |
 | 47% - Stainless Steel GF | 293 - Follow-up |  |  |  |  |
Patton et al. 1996[60] | 100% - Titanium GF | 110 - Initial | 8/110 (7%) | 1/110 (0.9%) | 0/30 (0%) | - |
 |  | 30 - Follow-up |  |  |  |  |
Langan et al. 1999[46] | Titanium (not reproted %) | 187 - Initial | 3/187 (1.6%) | 0/75 (0%) | 0/70 (0%) | 1/70 (1.4%) |
 | Stainless Steel | 75 - Follow-up |  |  |  |  |
Rogers et al. 1998[49] | 70% - Titanium GF | 132 -Initial | 4/132 (3%) | - | 1/47 (2%) | - |
 | 16% - Stainless Steel GF | 47 - Follow-up |  |  |  |  |
 | 8% - Vena Tech Filter |  |  |  |  |  |
 | 6% - Bird's Nest Filter |  |  |  |  |  |
Rodriguez et al. 1996[47] | 100% - Titanium GF | 40 - Total | - | - | 4/40 (10%) | - |
TOTAL | Â | Â | 39/814 (4.8%) | 7/473 (1.5%) | 12/480 (2.5%) | 3/363 (0.8%) |